- Strategically Selling A Financial Advisory Practice: Your Guide To A Successful Transition
- Dual Registration Dilemma: Navigating FINRA & SEC Regulatory Shifts
- RIA M&A Activity Rebounds: Opportunities & Challenges For Wealth Managers & Advisors
- Navigating Criminal Disclosures On FINRA’s Form U4
- How To Buy A Registered Investment Advisor (RIA) Business
*If you’re under FINRA or SEC investigation, or if you have a meritless disclosure on your CRD, BrokerCheck, IARD, and IAPD record, call us right now at (303) 952-4025 to talk with an attorney and receive a priority consultation at no charge.
Award Date: March 3, 2022
Hearing Site: San Francisco, California
Respondent Firm: GCA Advisors, LLC
Claimant Representative: Michelle Atlas-Quinn, J.D.
The advisor joined the firm in 2012, working exclusively with institutional investors. During his time with the firm, he did not receive adequate training on firm policies, and firm management never trained him on compliance.
Over the course of about two and a half years, the advisor sent marketing emails to prospective clients. The emails mentioned investment banking deals with which the advisor had previously been involved. While some of the deals mentioned had been completed by the firm, others had been completed while the advisor was with a previous firm. However, the emails inadvertently read as though all of the deals had been completed with the current firm. Firm management was copied on and aware of all of the emails.
In 2015, the advisor was terminated by the firm. The allegations published in his records stated that he had sent out marketing materials to prospective clients that did not adhere to the firm’s guidelines.
After filing for FINRA arbitration, the respondent firm initially filed an answer denying the advisor’s claim and asserting various defenses. However, our team was able to resolve the issues with the firm prior to the arbitration hearing. Without admitting liability on its own part, the firm agreed not to oppose the advisor’s effort to have the disclosure expunged.
The respondent firm attended the hearing and asserted no opposition, as stipulated prior to the hearing. The Arbitrator reviewed the exhibits presented, listened to the advisor’s testimony, and heard the arguments presented by Michelle Atlas-Quinn, J.D.
Within one week following the hearing, the Arbitrator issued an award recommending that the reason for termination of the advisor’s records is changed from “Discharged” to “Voluntary” and that the negative termination and corresponding internal review disclosures be expunged from the arbitrator’s public records.
With no other disclosures tainting his records, this advisor will soon have perfect CRD and BrokerCheck records, once again.
If you’d like to learn more about AdvisorLaw’s FINRA Disclosure Expungement services, please fill out the contact form below. Our consultations are complimentary, and our services were created exclusively for financial advisors.
- Dual Registration Dilemma: Navigating FINRA & SEC Regulatory Shifts - November 30, 2023
- Navigating Criminal Disclosures On FINRA’s Form U4 - November 16, 2023
- 30-Year Industry Veteran Restores Flawless Records With ARS Dispute Expungement - November 1, 2023