- Breaking Away: The Myths And Realities Of Leaving A Wirehouse
- SEC’s Cybersecurity Rule: What RIAs & Funds Need To Know
- What events will trigger a FINRA inquiry?
- FINRA’s Rule 4111 & New “Restricted” Label On BrokerCheck
- Boca Raton Advisor Expunges Four, 20-Year-Old Disclosures
- Massachusetts Advisor Clears Record Of U5 Termination
*If you’re under FINRA or SEC investigation, or if you have a meritless disclosure on your BrokerCheck, CRD, IARD, or IAPD record, call us right now at (303) 952-4025 to talk with an attorney and receive a priority consultation at no charge.
Award Date: August 5, 2022
Hearing Site: Cleveland, Ohio
Respondent Firm: Pruco Securities, LLC
Claimant Representative: Doc Kennedy, MBA, J.D., and Zack Morse, J.D.
A North Carolina-based advisor with over three decades of experience in the financial services industry had a 20-year-old customer dispute on his public record. The advisor hired AdvisorLaw to seek expungement of the disclosure through FINRA arbitration.
At the very beginning of his career, our advisor inherited a customer account from the customer’s previous advisor. The customer was approximately in her 70s, and our advisor recommended a modified premium variable universal life policy based on the customer’s investor profile and objectives. Our advisor explained all of the details of the policy to the customer and provided her with all applicable written materials, which she signed. Notably, our advisor did not and never would represent such a policy or a living benefit as long-term-care insurance, and he specifically explained the way that the policy’s premiums worked.
The customer purchased the recommended policy in 1993. In 1995, our advisor transferred his registration to another firm, and the customer ceased to be a client of his. Then, in 2002, thirteen years into his career, our advisor was hit with a customer dispute disclosure when the customer claimed that our advisor had misrepresented the policy by allegedly selling it as “nursing home” insurance and representing that the premiums would never exceed $1,500 per year. The firm settled with the customer as a business decision for about $15,000, and our advisor lived with the disclosure on his public BrokerCheck record for the next two decades.
The FINRA Dispute Resolution Arbitrator focused on the materials provided and listened to the advisor’s testimony during the hearing, along with arguments presented by Dochtor Kennedy, MBA, J.D. and Zack Morse, J.D. The Arbitrator made the determination that “[t]he documents in the record does not support the Customer’s claims at the time of sale,” as our advisor testified that “the 74-year-old Customer did not say the things alleged at the time of sale or for nearly ten years after the sale,” and she “was not confused or unhappy with her purchase prior to filing the customer dispute.” Finding that “[t]he exhibits in the record and the credible and unrefuted testimony of [our advisor] contradict the CRD claims,” the Arbitrator also noted that “[t]his is the only customer complaint against [the advisor] over a career of several decades.”
With the Arbitrator’s conclusion that “[t]he claims were clearly erroneous and false, as necessitated by Rule 2080,” our advisor’s records will soon be customer-dispute-disclosure free — for the first time in two decades — thanks to AdvisorLaw.
If you’d like to learn more about AdvisorLaw’s FINRA Disclosure Expungement services, please fill out the contact form below. Our consultations are complimentary, and our services were created exclusively for financial advisors.
- What events will trigger a FINRA inquiry? - May 23, 2023
- FINRA’s Rule 4111 & New “Restricted” Label On BrokerCheck - May 18, 2023
- Boca Raton Advisor Expunges Four, 20-Year-Old Disclosures - May 15, 2023