
- Splitting Away From FINRA: Why Advisors Are Choosing The RIA Path
- State RIA Enforcement: What Advisors Need To Know
- Anticipating Document Review Deficiencies: A Case For Acting On AdvisorLawâs Recommendations
- Outside Business Activities: Minefield For Financial Advisors
- Bay Area Advisor Restores Perfect, 30-Year BrokerCheck Records With Termination Expungement
- Starting Your RIA: Considerations For New Advisors
Award Date: July 12, 2024
Claimant Representative: Alex Padla, J.D., HLBS Law
Respondent Firm: Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith IncorporatedÂ
Case Objective:
This California advisor has maintained a perfect public BrokerCheck record since early 1998 â except for a single customer dispute in 2016. In hopes of getting the mark expunged, he hired HLBS Law to pursue expungement through FINRA arbitration.
Summary:
In late 2014, an investor became a customer of the advisor, when he inherited her account. The advisor met with the customer, reviewed her portfolio, and recommended liquidating several energy-related stocks. The customer then asked for advice regarding energy investments.
The advisor explained a strategy of taking losses on the customerâs existing energy-related stocks to offset capital gains while retaining exposure to the energy sector. The customer liked the strategy and chose to implement it. Additionally, she purchased an auto-callable, market-lined, step-up note related to the S&Pâs Oil and Gas Exploration and Production Select Industry Index. Subsequently, the customer purchased two other recommended notes.
While the customerâs portfolio experienced substantial gains, two of her notes were redeemed at a loss. In September 2016, the customer lodged a claim alleging misrepresentations, unsuitable recommendations, and failure to follow instructions. She sought over $400,000 in damages, and Merrill Lynch settled with her for around $60,000.
Resolution:
Merrill Lynch participated in the advisorâs expungement hearing and did not oppose his request to expunge the claim. The FINRA arbitrator reviewed all written materials submitted, and he listened to the advisorâs testimony and the arguments in favor of expungement presented by Alex Padla, J.D., HLBS Law.Â
The Arbitratorâs award stated that âBased upon the pleadings, [the advisorâs exhibits], and [his] credible sworn testimony, the Arbitrator found that the allegations contained [in the claim] are erroneous and false.â He noted that âThe Customer asked for the market-lined investments (âMLIsâ) which she purchasedâ and that the advisor had âdutifully explained the MLIs to the Customer and provided the related prospectus and other information to be sure that the Customer understood the investments which she purchased.â He added, âMoreover, the MLIs which were purchased represented only 3.8% of the Customerâs portfolioâ and that âThe Customerâs allegations appear to have been motivated by a decline in the value of the two MLIs which she purchased and [the claim was] not related in any way to [the advisorâs] action or any failure to act [on his part.]â
With the Arbitratorâs recommendation to expunge the erroneous allegations from the advisorâs records, he will soon have a record reflective of over 25 years of perfect conduct in the industry.