

Key Takeaways From SEC 2026 Examination Priorities

FINRA Awards Expungement Of Misleading Termination For Florida FA

FINRA Arbitration Panel Awards Expungement Of False Unsuitability Claim

Have You Completed Your Annual SEC Review (Rule 206(4)-7)?

Is your Form ADV Part 2 still compliant with the fiduciary duty?
Quick Summary
- Case Outcome: A three-arbitrator FINRA panel unanimously granted the expungement of a 2021 customer dispute from a Honolulu-based advisor's record, restoring a 17-year unblemished career.
- Legal Finding: The Panel ruled the allegations were "false" under FINRA Rule 2080(b)(1)(C).
- The Allegation: The 2021 claim alleged unsuitable recommendations related to a private placement fund (GPB Capital Holdings II, LP) that was later revealed to be a $1.7 billion issuer-level fraud.
- Key Evidence: The customer involved provided a sworn affidavit supporting expungement, admitting the allegation was a "false disclosure" and acknowledging the investment was suitable for her profile at the time of purchase.
- Arbitration Ruling: The Panel found the advisor had no involvement in the issuer fraud and that the investment represented only 4% of a client’s portfolio, aligning perfectly with her aggressive risk tolerance and 10-year horizon.
Case Objective:
On September 18, 2025, a veteran financial advisor from Columbia, South Carolina, achieved a significant victory, winning a FINRA expungement to remove an unwarranted entry from his public BrokerCheck and CRD records. This landmark case, guided by the legal expertise of HLBS Law, serves as a powerful testament to the process for erasing outdated and baseless customer disputes that can unfairly tarnish a financial professional's reputation.
Is it possible to remove an old, dismissed complaint from a financial advisor’s public record? The answer, as this case clearly demonstrates, is yes. The advisor, with a distinguished career spanning nearly 20 years, faced a single blemish on his record—a 2011 client complaint. The client had alleged that the advisor made unapproved changes to her variable annuity holdings. However, the firm, Northwestern Mutual Investment Services, LLC, had investigated and denied the claim without any admission of fault or monetary exchange.
Summary:
The dispute originated in late 2010 when the advisor took on a new client to help her transition an aggressive investment portfolio to a more conservative strategy. Her primary goals were income generation and reduced risk, a priority heightened by her husband's terminal illness. After detailed discussions and a review of her financial profile, the client verbally authorized the advisor to liquidate her variable annuity and temporarily move the funds to low-risk money market accounts, in preparation for a fixed annuity purchase.
Despite this explicit authorization, the client filed a formal complaint in May 2011, alleging unauthorized reallocations. A thorough internal investigation by Northwestern Mutual found no evidence to support the claim, and it was officially denied in July 2011. Even though the dispute was dismissed by the firm, it remained as a permanent mark on the advisor’s public record, creating a misleading impression for future clients.
Resolution:
To restore his unblemished professional profile, the advisor, represented by attorney William R. Bean, presented his case for expungement to a three-arbitrator FINRA Panel in 2025. The panel meticulously reviewed the facts and found the advisor's case to be overwhelmingly compelling.
The panel's unanimous decision recommended expungement under FINRA Rule 13805. In their official rationale, the arbitrators explicitly stated that the allegation was “factually impossible or clearly erroneous” and “false.” The panel’s written findings emphasized that the client had “explicitly authorized the liquidation of her variable annuity” and that the firm’s own investigation had found “no evidence of unauthorized trading whatsoever.”
Ultimately, the panel concluded that the claim had “no public protection value” and ordered the complete deletion of all associated disclosure pages from the advisor's record. This decisive victory not only cleared the advisor’s name but also restored his unblemished professional integrity, setting a precedent for others in similar situations.
Contact AdvisorLaw
Facing a similar situation? Contact our team today for a complimentary consultation to evaluate your case. Our experts will assess the viability of expungement and guide you through the process.
